Saturday, March 16, 2013

The truth is that content management systems, files sharing systems, social business software, and learning management systems in their current states just dont meet the needs of your employees. As such, your teams are going to continue using backchannels and hacks until you give them the tools that match their work style and preferences. Whats lacking?

Popular CMS: Drupal, SharePoint, Documentum, FileNet, and even WordPress.

The answer is . Make information more accessible to everyone on your team with Bloomfire. For as little as $99, you can reclaim an entire weeks worth of work every month.

But, it becomes difficult to manage these networks once the user base grows beyond a very small number. Put simply - most of these plays are designed to be one-to-many systems, instead of a many-to-many channel.

The usual suspects: Dropbox, iCloud, Rackspaces JungleDisk, Citrixs Sharefile, and EMCs Syncplicity.

Bloomfire takes from content management systems, file sharing systems, social business software, and learning management systems the features that users actually use and like, creating a knowledge sharing tool for the modern workforce.

Traditional LMS are complex, old-shioned software suites that want to train massive amounts of employees with minimal human efforts and contact. They are focused on one-way, top-dowAdvantages Social Networkingn communication. And for a while, they worked quite, because the mere availability of information was a big deal.

Class examples: Oracles iLearning, SAPs Cornerstone OnDemand, Plateau Systems, Taleo, and Saba.

One of the biggest inefficiencies that businesses ce today is the inability to quickly and effectively scale need-to-know information across the business. Companies that have successfully implemented a knowledge sharing culture:

The obvious players: Yammer, Jive, Kickapps and Lithium.

However, they arent very social,new york asian escort model and they dont display or let you consume content like you can with social media services like YouTube, or Facebook. And theyre not useful for collaboration, or content creation - those activities take place out of context, by definition. File sharing systems are too constrained -- they just dont do enough.

Social networks, forums, stream players and Q&A sites make it incredibly easy to create and consume content among networks.

While Bloomfire is loaded with modern content management, file sharing, and social features, these are merely a means to an end. The end goal of Bloomfire is to get your people sharing knowledge with one another. Many studies have been done that speak to the productivity benefits that are realized when employees are free to ask questions, share information, and PULL information from team experts when they need it. To learn more about our philosophy, check out the Bloomfire Manifesto.

LMS came from academia, and they still have traction in that vertical. They have lost ground in business contexts because we no longer learn on the job the way we learned in school.

According to the IDC Report, The Hidden Cost of Information Work, the average employee spends 9 hours per week searching for information that they need to do their job. For a very small team of just five people this has huge implications - more than an entire weeks worth of work spent looking for information in a single month!

These systems (now mostly cloud-based) work with little or no configuration, are super organized, and can handle any kind of content. Who doesnt love Dropbox?

People come to us looking for all kinds of thingsa wiki, an intranet, a corporate community, a blog site, Social Networking, a knowledge base, a sales enablement tool the list goes on and on. Whatever you want to call it, Bloomfire is a way for teams to share knowledge using modern social business, content management, file sharing and learning management features.

Most content management systems require serious time, money and customization. You drown in features, because they try and be everything to everyone. Not surprisingly, most CMS solutions are IT-owned, instead of chosen and run by the business side of the house. CMS deservedly has a reputation for being bloated. Plus, they are not easy to use and require a decent amount of training for the average user.

No comments:

Post a Comment