From a product perspective, combining social with Office and SharePoint is going to yield a product that has the most integrated experience around document collaboration, creation, co-authoring and social than any other offers out there, he said.

Make Your Industry Education Known: Earn BICSIs RITP Credential

It also found SharePoints enterprise social collaboration features lacking, and thought the product better suited for document management tasks thanfor people-centric collaboration, he said. Tibbr, on the other hand, gives the agency the type of social collaboration interaction it was looking to provide its users.

Other products offer cloud, on premises and hybrid deployment options, including IBM Connections, Jive and Tibbr, while vendors like Salesforce.com stick with a cloud-only approach with its Chatter product.

The next performance revolution is here - Compuware APM for Mainframe.

A recent study showed 92% of IT pros recognize that moving to the cloud provides a competitive edge, but only 20% plan to get there. The ilure to close that Cloud gap poses a serious threat.

> CIO Blackberry

Ultra-Low-Latency Networking

SharePoint for us isnt as widely well liked for a variety of reasons that arent all necessarily SharePoints problem, she said.

As for Jive Software, Koplowitz sees it taking advantage of its ability to move st and to be agnostic with regards to its interoperability with third-party business software.

Integrating Wireless and Wired Security

If You Dont Want to Wait for the ShFive Ways to Improve Your Enterprise Social Networking StrategyarePoint-Yammer Integration, Look Elsewhere, or Keep What You Have if It works

West Islip New York Public Schools network and connectivity upgrade offers benefits in the classroom and beyond.

Moreover, the smaller specialists not only focus exclusively on ESN, but they also often find it easier to move ster when adapting their products to customer feedback and technology innovations. They also dont have to comply with the competitive mandates of a larger corporate parent, and can thus be more agnostic in their partner relationships and third-party software integrations.

An Upgrade Thats Really Making the Grade

The company, which has a BYOD (bring your own device) policy regarding smartphones and tablets, is also eager to see SharePoint extend its mobile access, she said.

In this video, Henry Svendblad, Nemertes Principal Research Analyst, discusses three key requirements of your BYOD network - simplicity, scalability and security, and provides tips to evaluate the BYOD solutions for successful deployment.

Thus, a criteria for CIOs, especially those whose organizations arent yet using ESN software, could be to look at the vendors theyre already doing business with.

InterPortPolice, an inter-governmental agency for collaboration among airport and seaport law enforcement authorities in the U.S. and abroad, decided to adopt an ESN tool recently. Early in its selection process it crossed out SharePoint because of its poor mobile access, a recurrent criticism of the product that lasts to this day.

CIO Blackberry

Optimizing the Network

However, they will inevitably approach ESN from their ownperspectives, and its not clear to Cannell which one will emerge as the most appropriate one.

Some CIOs still pondering what ESN software to choose would be surprised to find out that employees have done an end-run around IT and adopted ESN tools already.

Koplowitz added: If Yammer is the bet, then what about those folks who want SharePoint but cant go to the cloud?

This isnt email or audio conferencing, where you put the service out and people naturally pick it up, he says. Were not there yet with ESN.

See if a network already exists, find out who started it and learn how its being used, Cannell says.

For now, the integration deliverables will be modest. Microsoft said in March that Office 365 customers will get the option this summer to replace SharePoint Onlines activity-stream component with Yammers activity stream.

The company started using SharePoint in 2007, but about 18 months ago decided it had to add an additional ESN tool. It picked Yammer, a few months before Microsoft acquired it.

IT leaders should establish a relationship with these first adopters and build on their interest for ESN in order to get others enthused and eager to adopt ESN software.

Its an extreme breadth of capabilities that were bringing together seamlessly in a social way, he added.

In 2014, Office 365 customers can expect integration between Yammer and other Office 365 components beyond SharePoint, Social Networking such as Lync and Exchange. Yammer is also being integrated with Microsoft Dynamics enterprise software.

> CIO Network

BlackBerry® for business. Built to keep your business moving.

The interesting thing right now is that were starting to see a maturing market with some emerging leaders, Koplowitz says.

Imagine a future shaped by simplicity. See it at HP Discover 2013. Register Now.

5 Steps to Power your Dev Teams &Sessions & strategies for your mobile business

Ready to Roam

Frequency: Monthly

Companies that make ESN software ll into three categories: collaboration platform companies, business application vendors and specialty players.

Case Study - Constangy

ESN is most effective when it becomes an underlying layer of social collaboration capabilities that are integrated into the applications employees use on a daily basis, whether its email clients, CRM software, ERP applications, office productivity applications or video conferencing wares. Obviously, the data involved in all of those applications can be highly sensitive.

IBMs Connections, first released in 2007, has been a solid product, in particular as an ESN complement for SharePoint, according to Koplowitz.

Join the Peer-Driven Community For All Things Mobility

Instead, it chose Tibbr, whose mobile support met the agencys needs. Ninety percent of our people are away from their desks 90 percent of the time, said Jay Grant, Secretary General of InterPortPolice.

Earn Your Masters in Information Technology Online at UMass Lowell

Discover the agile and scalable database for big data

Adding WOW to the WAN

But Be Aware that Microsoft Promises Big Rewards for Those Who Go With SharePoint-Yammer

CIO Network

Picking up on that shift, Microsoft plunked down more than $1 billion last summer to buy Yammer -- at the time a leading independent provider of ESN software -- in order to boost ESN capabilities primarily in its collaboration server SharePoint and also in other products like Office, Lync, Outlook and Dynamics.

Thus, IT leaders need to decide whether their ESN deployments will be all on premises, all in the cloud, or in a hydrid scenario, and then look into what the different vendors offer.

A key consideration for CIOs should be their organizations willingness or reluctance to have their ESN software running in a public cloud.

Cannell shares a similar opinion. Jive is a very viable vendor and a leader, he said.

As the fusion of Yammer with SharePoint and the other Office 365 tools progresses, the inteces and user experience will be unified and eventually become a single product that tightly integrates all of the functionality.

So Microsoft will support both models, but it is placing the development and innovation emphasis on the cloud-only Yammer and on SharePoint Online, the cloud version of the product that is part of the Office 365 cloud collaboration and communication suite.

In its most recent release this year, Connections is aiming to become a broader competitor with stronger document and content management capabilities and improved analytics features. IBM is also pushing ESN bundles tailored for human resources and marketing departments specifically.

GET A STRATEGIC EDGE WITH MANAGED NETWORK SOLUTIONS FROM SPRINT.

In the case of Microsoft, most SharePoint deployments to date have been on customer premises. However, the company has made it clear that the future of SharePoint and Office products in general is in the cloud via Office 365.

So what should be the strategy for CIOs regarding SharePoint, Yammer and competing ESN tools at this markets crossroads? Below we offer analysis criteria and suggestions.

Its users much prefer Yammer, which was quietly introduced by the CFO and achieved 96 percent adoption in about a month among the about 2,400 employees. SharePoint, after six years of use, is nowhere near that level of adoption.

See what vendors you have existing relationships with and may prefer to work with, says Larry Cannell,new york asian escort model a Gartner analyst.

Foundation for the Future

The rewards from the deep integration of Yammer with SharePoint, Office, Outlook, Lync, and other Microsoft products will be tremendous, according to Adam Pisoni, a Yammer co-founder who is now an engineering general manager in the Microsoft Office Division.

HP Converged Storage responds to any demand

A few years ago, Electrolux, a Swedish appliance vendor, decided it needed to give its employees an ESN tool that would help spur innovation and collaboration. The company used SharePoint, but quickly decided the native ESN capabilities in the product at the time werent enough for its needs, and deployed IBM Connections. Today, the company uses both products -- SharePoint for more static intranet functions like team sites, and IBM Connections for social collaboration interactions like microblogging and activity streams.

Transforming Customer Experience: The Convergence of Social, Mobile, and BPM

Mobilize: A unified IT approach to the mobile workspace

Later in the year, the integration will deepen with a single sign-on and the inclusion of Yammer in the Office 365 intece. Yammer will also gain integration with Office Web Apps, the browser-based version of the Office productivity suite, before the end of the year.

> CIO ERP

Frequency: Twice Weekly

Modernize your network and advance your midsize or large business: Five business challenges driving a need for network modernization

CIO ERP

Date: May 30th, 2013 Time: 11 AM PDT/ 2 PM EDT

CIO Leader

Its not clear to what extent Microsoft will be able to maintain in sync SharePoint Online and SharePoint server, assuming SharePoint Online will be upgraded much more frequently and Yammer will remain cloud-only, Cannell said.

That vision is exciting for Dawn Gartin, collaboration manager at Manhattan Associates, a supply chain software vendor.

Data Center Convergence

CIOs and IT managers on this quest should refrain from shutting down the networks they find.

Rules of Citizen Engagement: To Protect and Serve Data

Everything BlackBerry with tips, news and reviews from our mobility expert Al Sacco.

Itll be important for us to see that kind of functionality on all of the devices, she said.

Connections and SharePoint can co-exist because they are really good at different areas, he added.

Unified Wired-WLAN Solution for Enterprises--Simplifying and scaling wired and wireless networks (HP Fact Sheet)

WI-FI: Far and Wide

Finally, there are the smaller niche players like Jive Software, Socialtext and NewsGator which focus solely or primarily on their own ESN products.

The latest trends, news and tips on ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) from CIO.com.

Thats part of the lesson were looking at as we move forward to SharePoint 2013 and with the integration of Yammer: How that will all work together from a collaboration standpoint as our platform. How we can help the user get what they want from wherever they are, she said.

DEMO Velocity: Create branded interactive live events & training.

A network infrastructure overhaul gives a Michigan school district the flexibility needed to achieve its long-term teaching and learning goals.

Mobile workflow solutions for rugged use

NewsGators Social Sites is designed for SharePoint implementations on customer premises or in dedicated private clouds. Recently, the company has been working on extending Social Sites so that it will function not just as a SharePoint add on, but also play that part for other collaboration and business applications.

The sooner Microsoft is able to fully integrate the products, the better, as r as shes concerned.

Microsoft increased SharePoints native ESN features in the 2010 and in the latest 2013 version of the product, but as its acquisition of Yammer shows, even the company recognizes it needs to do more.

Determine Your Level of Comfort with the Cloud

In light of those questions, CIOs who want to keep their SharePoint server on premises can rely on ESN add-ons like NewsGators, which has been one of the preferred add-ons for years, and remains especially attractive for companies who arent comfortable using SharePoint Online.

The company uses SharePoint for its intranet and Yammer for employee interaction and collaboration.

Manhattan Associaties, which uses SharePoint 2010 on premises, is now drafting its plan for upgrading to SharePoint 2013 and possibly shifting some tasks for SharePoint Online, thus having a hybrid deployment.

Redefine Mobility Mgmt at Enterprise Mobile Hub

The issue with SharePoint has been that enterprise social moves very st and SharePoint doesnt, because its a big, complex product that does many other things, says Forrester Research analyst Rob Koplowitz.

Cisco Unified Workspace provides a solution for creating an organization-wide mobility strategy.

We wouldnt have been able to accomplish what we wanted to do with the standalone SharePoint, said Ralf Larsson, Electroluxs director of online employee engagement and development.

In this basic integration, when users click on the Yammer link, itll open up a new browser window and ask them to sign into Yammer. In the same timeframe, Microsoft will deliver a Yammer application that will let users embed a Yammer group feed into a SharePoint site, both with SharePoint Online and with SharePoint 2013 servers installed on customer premises. Microsoft will also make it possible for customers to replace the newsfeed in SharePoint 2013 servers installed on premise.

Guarding the Network with Next Gen Intrusion Protection

Is ESN an extension of other unified communications, collaboration and email products? Or is it an extension of business applications, he said. We dont know how thats going to shake out yet. There are credible arguments on both sides.

The end result will be greater than the sum of its parts, Pisoni said.

Data Center Convergence includes several aspects that an organization needs to consider for better management and optimal performance of mission critical applications.

In ct, a lot of Yammers adoption has happened in this way, as pockets of employees and managers sign up for the service and invite colleagues to join their network without consulting the IT department.

Nowadays wireless local area networks (WLAN ) is a mission critical part of the network no longer an afterthought. BYOD is a reality and mobile users demand high performance accessibility to corporate resources like never before.

While Microsoft has been busy working on integrating Yammer with SharePoint behind the scenes, its now clear that the effort is complex and that a fusion of the products will take at least two more years to complete.

Salesforce.coms Chatter has also become a dominant product in the ESN market, according to Koplowitz, who also said he has been surprised by the success of Tibbr. Tibcos made it. Tibbr has risen above the fray and sold very well, he said.

Enterprise Management Associates White Paper: Seven Best Practices for Network Management

Spend over 70% of your budget on innovation rather than operations with HP Converged Infrastructure

As mobility becomes commonplace, strategies for wireless and wired security must be woven together. This blending of environments causes unprecedented challenges for many organizations.

Then there are enterprise application vendors that have added ESN complements for their core ERP and CRM suites. Thats the case of Salesforce.com with its Chatter product and of SAP with Jam. Middleware vendor Tibco has an ESN product called Tibbr.

Frequency: Weekly

Frequency: Every Other Week

There are pros and cons that are evident on the suce for vendors in each category. The vendors in the first two categories are larger, with more resources, and thus can be assumed to be more stable. They can also offer the promise of broader software stacks that are natively integrated with their ESN components.

ESN Software May Be Used in Your Company Without Your Knowledge - and That Would Be Good

This webcast will showcase security technologies that meet attacks with integrated defense, focusing the advantage of intelligence more directly on some of the targets in the enterprise

A twice weekly newsletter with updates, insights and advice on career, technology, trends and IT strategy.

Microsoft lls into the first category, along with others like IBM with its Connections product and Cisco with WebEx Social. These are big software vendors that have other collaboration and communication products.

Not All ESN Vendors Are Created Equal

Cannell calls Tibbr one of the most interesting ESN products.

Dont look at this like a policy violation but as an opportunity to learn how you could use these tools, he said.

Whats Needed for Cloud Computing

IDG News Service (Miami Bureau) Enterprise social networking software, which offers social media capabilities adapted for workplace collaboration like employee profiles, activity streams, microblogging and document sharing, has evolved from a nice to have to a should have status in enterprises.

In ct, SharePoints ESN limitations opened up the opportunities for other vendors to come out with products that augment or replace SharePoint for ESN.

> CIO Leader

Watch this quick 3-minute video to find out how to keep your BYOD strategy without capital budget requirements.

From availability to security, we got your network infrastructure needs covered.

Connect to the Cloud ster with Comcast Business

A Simple Path to Effective Root Cause Analysis

Learn how your enterprise can protect the enterprise network by understanding exactly whats going on, providing intuitive access and reporting capabilities, and reducing the costs of security and compliance.

Backbase Bank 2.0 Portal: Banking Made Beautiful

SharePoint, first launched about a dozen years ago, has been the 800 pound gorilla of collaboration servers for a long time, but it has struggled to keep up on the enterprise social networking front.

In this brief 7-minute video, IDCs Rohit Mehra, Vice President for Network Infrastructure, discusses the impact of enabling BYOD on Enterprise Wireless LANs and share his insight on the requirements for a successful BYOD deployment.

CC interested parties and get weekly, monthly or daily delivery.

Install the StatCounter code and start tracking today.

Analyse collected data in 30 different ways.

See the search terms that bring visitors to your site.

From geographic location to browser popularity to how users navigate from page to page.

Invisible, to set up, Web, and does not display ads on your site.

Grant project access to co-workers,new york asian escort or expose your stats to the public.

Let us know what you think of the new filter feature, and what new filters youd like to see on this page!

All feedback is read by the StatCounter management and developers to improve the service. Unfortunately we cant reply to everyone! If you actually require support please visit the support section.

I noticed how the frequency of hits reported by StatCounter closely followed customer phone enquiries, peaking at the start of the week. In some cases I could match customers to the detailed paths they tooStatCounter? Webk through the site, and could see which business areas customers were most interested in.

Set up automatic email reports to your inbox.

Track multiple websites from the same account.

Youll be able to immediately see stats on the next visitors who come to your site; realtime, no delays!

Track incoming links from blogs and other websites.

Tips for Requesting LinkedIn Recommendations for Tech Job Seekers

Twitter Tips for Music Industry

Social networking sites are great for keeping up with friends across the globe and can also be advantageous in the internship or job search. Protecting Your Privacy Online

Twitter Job Search Tips

What is Twitter? How do you get started using it? What is a retweet? What is follow Friday? This Twitter guide, from About.com Guide to Web Trends, Daniel Nations, will explain the service, help you create an account, and guide you to popular Twitter applications.

How to Use LinkedIn

Facebook and Job Search Privacy Tips

When youre seeking employment, Twitter can be an effective part of your job search strategy. Used in conjunction with LinkedIn, job search engines, and other job sites, Twitter can help you make connections, find job listings, and build a personal brand that will help boost your career and expedite your job search.

The buzz lately is all about Twitter. How Twitter is a great communication tool, which it is. How Twitter is a great way to connect with people, which it is. And how Twitter can help you get a job, which it can. Help is the optimal word though.

Social Networking for Writers

If you are a Facebook user and are concerned about employers (or others) seeing the personal information that you have on Facebook, you can change your privacy settings so only certain people, like your friends or other students, can view your profile.

Using LinkedIn for networking can seem daunting. It shouldnt be. Getting started using LinkedIn is as easy as picking a password. Youll truly see the power of using LinkedIn once you build your list of connections. Heres how from About.com Guide to Working Moms, Katherine Lewis.

How to Use Social Media to Boost Your Health Career

Using Social Networking To Boost (or Bust) Your Career10 Reasons Social Media Should Rock Your World

Social media participation is an essential tool in networking with potential professional contacts, staying in touch with current and former contacts, Social Networking, recruiting employees, advancing your career, and keeping in touch with the world from About.com Guide to Human Resources,new york asian escort Susan Heathfield.

Job Search Facebook Apps

Connect With About.com Guides

Twitter

How to use LinkedIn as part of your job search, including how to increase your visibility and connections, so employers and recruiters can find you.

What is social media and how can it be optimizedHow To Use Social Networking To Boost Your Career in the health care industry? Can social media help you find a medical job or help you advance your health career, or make your job more efficient? Learn more about using social medial in the health care industry from About.com Guide to Health Careers, Andrea Santiago.

Tweet Your Way to a New Job - Or Not?

Social Networking for Lawyers and Legal Professionals

Your After-Work Behavior Can Harm Your Job or Career

Use these top social and professional networking sites to enhance your career and boost your job search, and learn how to use social networking sites to job search.

Whether youre new to the site or a long-time member, this article About.com Guide to Health Careers, Andrea Santiago will help you maximize your networking success on LinkedIn. LinkedIn is an effective and user-friendly website for professional networking for job searching or career development.

LinkedIn Tips for Healthcare Professionals

LinkedIn

A Guide to Using Twitter

When applying for a technical job - or any job, for that matter - that you found on LinkedIn, you may notice that the posting says Applicants with recommendations are preferred. Heres how to ask for a recommendation from About.com Guide to Tech Careers, Patricia Pickett.

Looking for a new job or to advance your career? LinkedIn is a critical career networking tool for todays savvy professionals. Heres how employers are using LinkedIn to develop relationships with and recruit potential employees from About.com Guide to Human Resources, Susan Heathfield.

Just about everyone is using Facebook for personal networking, but you can use it for professional networking, as well. You can take advantage of all those friends you have and use Facebook Applications to enhance your job search.

Should you be accessing Facebook or Twitter while on the job? Research suggests a good number of workplaces are actually banning employees from visiting social networking sites for any reason while on the job from About.com Guide to Tech Careers, Patricia Pickett.

Although social networking sites offer many advantages to college students, they can also pose a threat to protecting an individuals privacy online. Using Social Media in the IT Workplace

The Best Social Networking Sites for Job Searching

Its not enough to set up an engaging website: you have to get online and promote it. Heres how to get started from Ginny Wiehardt, About.com Guide to Fiction Writing.

Twitter has become more and more important to music industry, but to get the most bang for your buck, youve got to be smart about how you use it. This tips from About.com Guide to Music Careers, Heather McDonald, will help you maximize your Twitter success ctor.

Facebook

Networking has always been key to building professional relationships and finding a job. The advent of web-based social media has taken networking a step further. A recent survey found that social networking has the potential to change the business and practice of law over the next five years. Heres more from from About.com Guide to Legal Careers, Sally Kane.

Use LinkedIn for Recruiting Employees

5 Simple Steps to Use LinkedIn for Networking for Working Moms

Your behavior after work can harm your job or career. Find out what things you should refrain from doing from About.coms Career Planning Guide, Dawn Rosenberg McKay.

Using Social Networking in Your Internship Search

Social networking can be an integral part of your job search or career building - if you use it correctly. If you dont, even information you consider private like a photo posted on Facebook or a random comment on Twitter, could cost you your job and unexpectedly damage your career. Heres Social Networkinghow to use social networking to boost your career from About.coms Career Channel Guides. Youll also find tips on what you shouldnt do when it comes to social media and your career - and thats just as important as what you should do.

Watts, D. (2003). Six degrees: The science of a connected age. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Rogers, E. M. (1979). Network analysis of the diffusion of innovations. In P. Holland and S. Leinhardt (Eds.) Perspectives on Social network research (pp. 137-164).

Milardo, R. (1982). Friendship networks in developing relationships: Converging and diverging social environments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45(3), 162-172.

Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes, and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8, 109-112.

Mizruchi, M. (1996). What do interlocks do? Analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271-298.

Nohria, N. & Eccles, R. (1992). Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Borgatti, S., & Everett, M. (1992.). Graph colorings and power in experimental exchange networks. Social Networks, 14, 287-308.

Milardo, R., Johnson, M., & Huston, T. (1983). Developing close relationships: Changing patterns of interaction between pair members and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(5), 964-976.

Luce, R.D., & Perry, A.D. (1949). A method of matrix analysis of group structure. Psychometrika, 14, 95-116.

Rosengren, W.R. (1967). Structure, policy, and style: Strategies of organizational control, Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 140-164.

Marsden, P.V. (1981). Models and methods for characterizing the structural parameters of groups. Social Networks, 3, 1-27.

Freeman, L., Webster, C., & Kirke, D. (1998). Exploring social structure using dynamic three-dimensional color images. Social Networks, 20, 109-118.

Frank, O., M. Hallinan, & K. Nowicki. (1985). Clustering of dyad distributions as a tool in network modeling. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 11, 47-64.

Nolan, P., J. Skvoretz & G. Zemo. (1991). Size, work volume and differentiation: A study of U.S. customs houses. Social Science Quarterly, 72, 696-714.

Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (Eds.) (1979). Perspectives on social network research. New York, Academic Press.

Feldman, M. (1987). Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations. Office: Technology and People, 3, 83-101.

Frank, O. (1981). A survey of statistical methods for graph analysis. In Leinhardt, S. (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (110-155). San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

Freeman, L. C., White, D.R., & Romney, A.K. (1989) (Eds.). Research methods in social network analysis. Faix, VA: George Mason University Press.

Bernard, H.R., & Killworth, P.D. (1977). Informant accuracy in social network data II. Human Communication Research, 4, 3-18.

Breiger, R.L., Boorman, S.A., & Arabie, P. (1975). An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 12, 328-383.

Redding, W. (1979). Organizational communication theory and ideology: An overview. In D. Nimmo (Ed.) Communication Yearbook, 3, 309-341.

Horan, P.M. (1975). Information-theoretic measures and the analysis of social structures, Sociological Methods & Research, 3, 321-340.

Rogers, E. (1995). The diffusion of innovations. New York, Free Press.

Bernard, H.R., Killworth, P.D., & Sailor, L. (1982). Informant accuracy in social network data V: An experimental attempt to predict actual communication from recall data. Social Science Research, 11, 30-66.

Mintz, B. & M. Schwartz. (1981). Interlocking directorates and interest group formation, American Sociological Review, 46, 851-69.

Carrington, P. J., & G. H. Heil. (1981). COBLOC: A hierarchical method for blocking network data. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 8, 103-131

Barnett, G.A., & Rice, R.E. (1985). Longitudinal non-Euclidean networks: Applying Galileo. Social Networks 7, 287-322.

Jennings, H.H. (1960). Sociometric choice process in personality and group formation. In J.L. Moreno (Ed.),The sociometry reader. Glencoe, IL, Free Press.

Kim, Y. (1977). Communication patterns of foreign immigrants in the process of acculturation. Human Communication Research, 4:1, 66-77.

Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1972). Some evidence on the transitivity of positive interpersonal sentiment. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 1205-1209.

Tryon, R.C., & D.E. Bailey. (1970). Cluster analysis. New York, McGraw-Hill.

Bonacich, P., & Domhoff, G.W. (1981). Latent classes and group membership. Social Networks. 3:3, 175-196.

Burt, R. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In B. Staw, & Sutton, R. (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 22). New York, NY, JAI Press.

Roistacher, R.C. (1974). A review of mathematical methods in sociometry. Sociological Methods and Research, 3, 123-171.

Danowski, J. A., Barnett, G.A., & Friedland, M.H. (1986). Interorganizational networks via shared public relations firms: Centrality, diversification, media coverage, and publics image. In M.L. McLaughlin (Ed.) Communication Yearbook 10 (pp. 808-830). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Pfeffer, J., & G.E. Salancik. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

Hallinan, M.T. (1974). The structure of positive sentiment. New York, Elsevier.

Burt, R. S., & Minor, M. (1983). Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction. Newbury Park: Sage.

Valente, T. W. (1995). Network models of diffusion of innovations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Eveland, J., & Bikson, T. (1987). Evolving electronic communication networks: An empirical assessment. Office Technology and People, 3, 103-128.

Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. (1990). Social action models for the study of change in organizational fields. In J. Weesie and H. Flap (Eds.). Social networks through time, 1-30. Utrecht, The Netherlands: ISOR/University of Utrecht Press.

Smith-Lovin, L., J.V. Skvoretz and C.G. Hudson. (1986). Status and participation in six-person groups: A test of Skvoretzs comparative status model. Social Forces, 64, 992-1005.

Steinfield, C., & Kraut, R. (1996). The impact of interorganizational networks on buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 1(3).

Ibarra, H. (1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 471-501.

Bernard, H., Killworth, P., & Sailor, L. (1980). Informant accuracy in social network data IV. Social Networks, 2, 191-218.

McFarland, D.D., & D.J. Brown. (1973). Social distance as metric: A systematic introduction to smallest space analysis. In E.O. Laumann (Ed.), Bonds of pluralism: The form and substance of urban social networks. New York, Wiley, 213-253.

Friedkin, N. E. (1983). University Social Structure and Social Networks among Scientists, American Journal of Sociology, 1444-1465.

Doreian, P. (1988). Equivalence in a social network. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 13, 243-282.

Travers, J. & S. Milgram (1969). An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry 32, 425-443.

Friedkin, N. E. (1981). The development of structure in random networks: An analysis of the effects of increasing network density on five measures of structure. Social Networks, 3, 41-52.

Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: A generalization of Heiders theory. Psychological Review, 63, 277-292.

Hubbell, C. H. (1965). An input-output approach to clique identification. Sociometry, 28, 377-399

Sparrowe, R., Liden, R., Wayne, S., & Kraimer, M. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316-325.

Hage, P., & Harary, F. (1983). Structural models in anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Katz, L. (1953). A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika, 18, 39-43.

Carley, K. (1997). Extracting team mental models through textual analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 533-538.

Weick, K. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Baker, W. (2000). Achieving success through social capital. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Alba, R.D., & Kadushin, C. (1976). The intersection of social circles: A new measure of social proximity in networks. Sociological Methods and Research, 5, 77-102.

Everett, M.G. (1982). A graph theoretic blocking procedure for social networks. Social Networks, 4, 147-167.

Peay, E. R. (1982). Structural models with qualitative values. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 8, 161-192

Barley, S. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78-108.

Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35-67.

Laumann, E. O. (1973). Bonds of pluralism: The form and substance of urban social networks. New York, Wiley.

Burt, R. S. (1984). Network items and the General Social Survey. Social Networks 6, 293-340.

Granovetter, M. (1994). Getting a job. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Athanassiades, J. C. (1973). The distortion of upward communication in hierarchical organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 16:207-226.

Seidman, S. B. (1985). Structural consequences of individual position in nondyadic social networks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 367-386.

Galaskiewicz, J., & Marsden, P. V. (1978). Interorganizational resource networks, Formal patterns of overlap. Social Science Research, 7, 89-107.

Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal organization. Psychological Review 51, 358-374.

Burt, R. S. (1978). Cohesion versus structural equivalence as a basis for network subgroups. Sociological Methods and Research, 7, 189-212.

Allen, T. (1966). Managing the flow of scientific and technological information. Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Boyd, J. P., J. H. Haehl & L. D. Sailer. (1972). Kinship systems and inverse semigroups. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 37-61.

Davis, J. A., & S. Leinhardt. (1972). The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups. In Berger, M.J. Zelditch and B., Anderson (Eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.

Lankford, P.M. (1974). Comparative analysis of clique identification methods, Sociometry, 37, 287-305.

Bavelas, A. (1950). Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 271-282.

Valente, T. W. (1996). Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 18(1), 69-90.

Galaskiewicz, J. & S. Wasserman. (1981). Change in a regional corporate network. American Sociological Review, 46, 475-84.

Laumann, E., & Marsden, P. (1979). The analysis of oppositional structures in political elites: Identifying collective actors. American Sociological Review, 44, 713-732.

Cummings, J., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (2002). Beyond Hearing: Where real world and online support meet. Group Dynamics, 6, 78-88.

Krippendorf, K., (1980). Clustering. In P.R. Monge and J.N. Cappella (Eds.). Multivariate Techniques for Human Communication Research. New York, Academic Press, 259-308.

Marwell, G., P. Oliver, & R. Prahl. (1988). Social networks and collective action: A theory of the critical mass III. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 502-34.

Pugh, D.S., D.F. Hickson, C.R. Hinnings and C. Turner. (1968). Dimensions of organizational structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13, 65-104.

Carley, K.M., & Krackhardt, D. (1996). Cognitive inconsistencies and non-symmetric friendship. Social Networks. 18:1, 1-28.

Fischer, C.S. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cross, R., & Prusak, L. (2002). The people that make organizations stop - or go. Harvard Business Review, 80(6), 104-112.

Skvoretz, J., & T.J. Fararo. (1996). Status and participation in task groups: A dynamic network model. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1366-1414.

Lin, N. (2001). Social capital. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Hansen, M. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.

Krackhardt, D., & Hanson, J. (1993). Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 104-111.

Newcomb, T.M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Breiger, R. (1979). Toward an operational theory of community elite structure, Quality and Quantity, 13, 21-47.

Ahuja, M., & Carley, K. (1998). Network structures in virtual organizations. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(4).

Murray, S. O., & R.C. Poolman. (1982). Strong ties and scientific literature. Social Networks, 4:3, 225-232.

Wickesberg, A.K. (1968). Communications networks in the business organization structure, Academy of Management Journal, 11, 253-262.

Rice, R. E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 219-245.

Clawson, D., A. Neustadtl, and J. Bearden. (1986). The logic of business unity: Corporate contributions to the 1980 congressional elections. American Sociological Review. 51, 797-811.

Burt, R. S. (1976). Position in networks. Social Forces, 55, 93-122.

Bernard, H.R., Killworth, P.D., & Sailor, L. (1980). Informant accuracy in social network data IV: A comparison of clique level structure in behavioral and cognitive network data. Social Networks, 2, 191-218.

Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Katz, L. (1947). On the matric analysis of sociometric data. Sociometry, 10, 233-241.

Bott, E. (1957). Family and social network. London, Tavistock Publications

Friedkin, N. E. (1991). Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 1478-1504.

Faust, K. (1988). Comparison of methods for positional analysis: Structural and general equivalences. Social Networks, 10, 313-341.

Harary, F. (1957). Structural duality. Behavioral Science, 2, 255-265.

Roy, W. (1983). The interlocking directorate structure of the United States. American Sociological Review, 42, 248-57.

White, D.R., & Reitz, K.P. (1983). Graph and semigroup homomorphisms on networks of relations. Social Networks, 5, 193-234.

Burt, R. S. (1986). A note on sociometric order in the general social survey network data. Social Networks, 8, 149-174.

Weller, S., & Romney, A. (1990). Metric scaling: Correspondence analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Harary, F. (1971). Demiarcs: An atomistic approach to relational systems and group dynamics. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 1, 195-205.

Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1976). Local structure in social networks. In D. Heise (Ed.) Sociological Methodology (pp. 1-45). San Francisco, Josey-Bass.

Mintz, B. & M. Schwartz. (1985). The power structure of American business. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.

Adler, P., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.

Cross, R., Borgatti, S., & Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support human networks. California Management Review, 44(2), 25-46.

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Sailer, L.D. (1978). Structural equivalence, meaning and definition, computation and application. Social Networks, 1, 73-90.

Lin, N., Ensel, W., & Vaughn, J. (1981). Social resources and strength of ties: Structura ctors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review, 46, 393-405.

Iacobucci, D., & Wasserman, S. (1987). Dyadic social interactions. Psychological Bulletin 102, 293-306.

Tushman, M., & Romanelli, E. (1983). Uncertainty, social location and influence in decision : A sociometric analysis. Management Science, 29(1), 12-23.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Neustadtl, A. & D. Clawson. (1988). Corporate political groupings: Does ideology unify business political behavior? American Sociological Review. 53, 172-90.

Wasserman, S., Faust, K., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1990). Correspondence and canonical analysis of relational data. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 15, 11-64.

Lindzey, G., & Borgatta, E.F. (1954). Sociometric measurement. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology. Volume 1, 405-448. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Panning, W.H. (1982). Fitting blockmodels to data. Social Networks, 4, 81-101.

Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1977). A dynamic model for social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 5, 5-20

Ibarra, H., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1997). New directions in social network research on gender and organizational careers. In C. C. a. S. Jackson (Ed.), Creating tomorrows organization: A handbook for future research in organizational behavior (pp. 359-383). Sus, England: John Wiley.

Rice, R. E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion, socio-emotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research, 14, 85-108.

Mandel, M. J. (1983). Local roles and social networks. American Sociological Review, 48, 376-386.

Blau, P. & R. K. Merton. (1981). Continuities in structural inquiry. London and Beverly Hills, Sage.

Iacobucci, D., & Wasserman, S. (1990). Social networks with two sets of actors. Psychometrika. 55, 707-720.

Arabie, P. (1984). Validation of sociometric structure by data on individuals attributes. Social Networks, 6, 373-403.

Tichy, N., Tushman, M., & Fombrum, C. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4, 507-519.

Thompson, J. D. (1956). Authority and power in identical organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 290-301.

Strogatz, S. (2003). Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order. New York: Hyperion Books.

Powell, W., Koput, K, & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-138.

Doreian, P. (1980). Linear models with spatially distributed data: Spatial disturbances or spatial effects. Sociological Methods & Research, 9, 29-66.

Social Network References (Academic Bibliography)

Seibert, S., Kraimer, M., & Liden, R. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219-237.

Kraut, R., Steinfield, C., Chan, A., Butler, B., & Hoag, A. (1998). Coordination and virtualization: The role of electronic networks and personal relationships. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(4).

de Sola Pool, I., & Kochen, M. (1978). Contacts and influence. Social Networks 1, 5-51.

Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1973). The structural implications of measurement error in sociometry. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 3, 85-111.

Wellman, B. (1979). The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1201-31.

Freeman, L. C. (1984). The impact of computer based communication on the social structure of an emerging scientific specialty. Social Networks, 6, 201-221.

Laumann, E. O., P. V. Marsden, & J. Galaskiewicz. (1977). Community influence structures: Extension and replication of a network approach. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 594-631.

Breiger, R. L., & P. E. Pattison. (1986). Cumulated social roles: The duality of persons and their algebras. Social Networks, 8, 215-256.

Papa, M. (1990). Communication network patterns and employee performance with new technology. Communication Research, 17(3), 344-368.

Kochen, M. (1985). The structure of acquaintance nets and rates of societal development. Social Networks, 7(4), 323-339.

Cook, K.S., Emerson, R.M., Gilmore, M.R., & Yamagishi, T. (1983). The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 275-305.

Cartwright, D. & F. Harary. (1977). A graph theoretic approach to the investigation of system-environment relationships. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 5, 87-111.

Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.

Macy, M.W., & J. Skvoretz. (1998). The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers, A computational model. American Sociological Review, 63, 638-660.

MacRae, D. (1960). Direct ctor analysis of sociometric data. Sociometry, 23, 360-371.

Monge, P., Edwards, J., & Kirste, K. (1983). Determinants of communication network involvement: Connectedness and integration. Group and Organization Studies, 8(1), 83-111.

Killworth, P.D. (1974). Intransitivity in the structure of small closed groups. Social Science Research, 3, 1-23.

Criswell, J.H. (1946). Measurement of reciprocation under multiple criteria of choice. Sociometry 9, 126-127.

Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12(4), 502-517.

Hesse, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., & Walsh, J. (1993). Returns to science: Computer networks and scientific research in oceanography. Communications of the ACM, 36(8), 90-101.

Turk, H. (1970). Interorganizational networks in urban society: Initial perspectives and comparative research. American Sociological Review, 35, 1-20.

Wasserman, S. (1980). Analyzing social networks as stochastic processes. Journal of American Statistical Association, 75, 280-294.

Stevenson, W., & Gilly, M. (1991). Information processing and problem solving: The migration of problems through formal positions and networks of ties. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 918-928.

Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Computers, networks and work. Scientific American, 265(3), 116.

Ford, L.R., & Fulkerson, D.R. (1962). Flows in networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Marsden, P. & Lin, N. (Eds.) (1982). Social structure and network analysis. Beverly Hills, Sage.

Stephenson, K., & Zelen, M. (1989). Rethinking centrality: Methods and applications. Social Networks, 11, 1-37.

Berkowitz, S.D., & B. Wellman (Eds.). (1983). Structural sociology. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press.

Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, Social Networking, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213-238.

Bonacich, P. (1972). Technique for analyzing overlapping memberships. In H. Costner (Ed.), Sociological Methodology, 176-185. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

Frank, O. (1980). Transitivity in stochastic graphs and digraphs. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 7, 199-213.

Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York: Little, Brown, and Company.

Foster, C.C., & W.J. Horvath. (1971). A study of a large sociogram III, Reciprocal choice probabilities as a measure of social distance. Behavioral Science, 16, 429-435.

Bernard, H.R., Killworth, P.D., Kronenfeld, D., & Sailor, L. (1985). On the validity of retrospective data: The problem of informant accuracy. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 495-517.

Fienberg, S. E., & Wasserman, S. (1981). Categorical data analysis of single sociometric relations. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (156-192). San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

Cummings, J., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social relationships. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 103-108.

Baker, F.B., & Hubert, L.J. (1981). The analysis of social interaction data. Sociological Methods and Research, 9, 339-361.

Leinhardt, S. (1973). The development of transitive structure in childrens interpersonal relations. Behavioral Science, 12, 260-271.

Hurlbert, J., Haines, V., & Beggs, J. (2000). Core networks and tie activation: What kinds of routine networks allocate resources in nonroutine situations? American Sociological Review, 65, 598-618.

Laumann, E. O., & P. V. Marsden. (1982). Microstructural analysis in interorganizational systems. Social Networks, 4, 329-48.

Fienberg, S. E., Meyer, M.M., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Statistical analysis of multiple sociometric relations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80, 51-67.

Coleman, J.S., Katz, E., & Menzel, H. (1957). The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry 20, 253-270.

White, H.C., & Breiger, R.L. (1975). Pattern across networks. Society, 12, 68-73.

Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique detection. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 113-120.

Mullins, N.C. (1968). The distribution of social and cultural properties in informal communication among biological scientists. American Sociological Review, 33, 786-797.

Barabasi, A.L. (2002) Linked: The New Science of Networks.Cambridge, Perseus.

Shaw, M. (1964). Communication networks. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 111-147). New York: Academic Press.

Garton, L., & Wellman, B. (1995). Social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: A review of the Research, literature. Communication Yearbook, 18, 434-453.

Suitor, J., Wellman, B., & Morgan, D. (1997). Its about time: How, why, and when networks change. Social Networks, 19, 1-7.

Hallinan, M., & D. Felmlee. (1975). An analysis of intransitivity in sociometric data. Sociometry, 38, 195-212.

Stark, R. & Bainbridge, W. (1980). Networks of ith, interpersonal bonds and recruitment to cults and sects, American Journal of Sociology, 85, 1376-95

Mokken, R.J. (1979). Cliques, clubs and clans. Quality and Quantity, 13, 161-173.

Allen, T. & Cohen, S. (1969). Information flow in research and development laboratories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 12-20.

Rogers, E.M. (1987). Progress, problems, and prospects for network research: Investigating relationships in the age of electronic communication technologies. Social Networks, 9(4), 285-310.

Eveland, J., & Bikson, T. (1988). Work group structures and computer support: A field experiment. Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6(4), 354-379.

Meyer, M.W. (1972). Size and the structure of organizations: A causal analysis, American Sociological Review, 37, 434-441.

Heider, F. (1979). On balance and attribution. In Holland, P., & S. Leinhardt (Eds.) Perspectives on social network research (pp, 11-24). New York: Academic Press.

Bougon,new york asian escort model M., Weick, K., & Binkhorst, D. (1977). Cognition in organizations: An analysis of the Utrecht jazz orchestra, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 22, 606-639.

Bernard, H. R. & P. D. Killworth. (1973). On the social structure of an ocean-going research vessel and other important things. Social Science Research, 2, 145-184.

Kim, H., & Stiff, J. (1991). Social networks and the development of close relationships. Human Communication Research, 18(1), 70-91.

Hoffman, D., & Franke, G. (1986). Correspondence analysis: Graphical representation of categorical data in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 213-227.

Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107-112.

Mizruchi, M. S. (1989). Similarity of political behavior among American corporations. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 401-24.

Winship, C., & Mandel, M. (1983). RolesSocial Networks Social Networking and positions: A critique and extension of the blockmodeling approach. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1983-1984, 314-344. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Barnlund, D., & Harland, C. (1963). Propinquity and prestige as determinants of communication networks. Sociometry, 26, 467-479.

Webber, R.A. (1970). Perceptions of interactions between superiors and subordinates. Human Relations, 23, 235-248.

Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Nadel, S.F. (1957). The theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.

Harary, F. (1959). On the measurement of structural balance. Behavioral Science, 4, 316-323.

Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, L., & Borgatti, S. (2001). Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics, 30(2), 100-120.

Breiger, R.L. (1974). The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces, 53, 181-190.

Gould, R. V. (1993). Collective action and network structure. American Sociological Review, 58, 182-96.

Schwartz, J.E. (1977). An examination of CONCOR and related methods for blocking Sociometric Data. In D.R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological Methodology, 255-282. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Marsden, P.V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435-463.

Padgett, J. F., & Ansell, C. (1993). Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici: 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1259-1319.

Wellman, B. & S.D. Berkowitz (Eds.) (1988). Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation, cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1287-1335.

Cross, R., Nohria, N., & Parker, A. (2002). Six myths about informal networks - and how to overcome them. Sloan Management Review, 43(3), 67-76.

Friedkin, N. E. (1986). A formal theory of social power. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 12, 103-126.

Dill, W.R. (1958). Environment as an influence on managerial autonomy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 409-443.

Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123-140.

Rice, R. E., Grant, A., Schmitz, J., & Torobin, J. (1990). Individual and network influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging. Social Networks, 12(1), 27-55.

Danowski, J. (1980). Group attitude conformity and connectivity of organizational communication networks for production, innovation and maintenance content. Human Communication Research, 6, 299-308.

Wellman, B., Wong, R., Tindall, D., & Nazer, N. (1997). A decade of network change: Turnover, persistence and stability in personal communities. Social Networks, 19, 27-50.

Podolny, J., & Baron, J. (1997). Resources and relationships, social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673-693.

Farace, R.V., P.R. Monge & H. M. Russell. (1977). Communicating and organizing. Menlo Park, CA, Addison-Wesley.

Hartman, R., & Johnson, J. D. (1989). Social contagion and multiplexity communication networks as predictors of commitment and role ambiguity. Human Communication Research, 15(4), 523-548.

Kenny, D.A., & LaVoie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 18. New York: Academic Press.

Zaenglein, M.M., & C. Smith. (1972). An Analysis of Individual Communication Patterns and Perceptions in Hospital Organizations. Human Relations, 25, 493-504.

Lorrain, F., & White, H.C. (1971). Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 49-80.

Coleman, J.S., Katz, E., & Menzel, H. (1966). Medical innovation: A diffusion study. Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill.

Yamagishi, T. & K. S. Cook. (1993). Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 235-48.

Burt, R. S. (1980). Actor interests in a social topology: Foundations for a structural theory of action. Sociological Inquiry, 49, 107-132.

Boorman, S.A. (1975). A combinatorial optimization model for transmission of job information through contact networks. Bell Journal of Economics, 6, 216-249.

Arabie, P. (1977). Clustering Representations of Group Overlap. Journal of Mathematical Sociological, 5, 113-128.

Wellman, B., & S. Wortley. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558-88.

Hovland, C., & Weiss, W. (1952). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635-650.

Harary, F. (1969). Graph theory. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.

Breiger, R.L., & Pattison, P. E. (1986). Cumulated social roles: The duality of persons and their algebras. Social Networks 8, 215-256.

Burt, R. S. (1980). Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 79-141

Friedkin, N. E. (1982). Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks. Social Networks, 3, 273-285.

Barnes, J. A. (1983). Graph theory in network analysis Social Networks, 5, 235-244.

Nieminen, J. (1973). On the centrality in a directed graph. Social Science Research, 2, 371-378.

Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1970). A method for detecting structure in sociometric data. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 492-513.

Eisenberg, E. M., P. R. Monge, & R. V. Farace. (1984). Coorientation on communication rules in managerial dyads. Human Communication Research, 11, 2, 261-271.

Wasserman, S., & Galaskiewicz, J., Eds. (1994). Advances in social network analysis: Research, from the social and behavioral sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Dawson, R. (2003). Living networks: Leading your company, customers, and partners in the hyper-connected economy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Monge, P., Rothman, L., Eisenberg, E., Miller, K., & Kirste, K. (1985). The dynamics of organizational proximity. Management Science, 31(9), 1129-1141.

Baker, W. E. (1990). Market networks and corporate behavior American Journal of Sociology. 96, 589-625.

Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Discussion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M.B. (1983). Communication networks and the development of romantic relationships: An expansion of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 10(1), 55-79.

Han, S.K. (1996). Structuring relations in on-the-job networks. Social Networks, 18(1), 47-68.

Lincoln, J. & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 181-199.

Burt, R. S. (1981). Toward a structural theory of action. New York: Academic Press.

OReilly, C.A. (1978). The intentional distortion of information in organizational communication, a laboratory and field investigation. Human Relations, 31(2), 173-193.

Carroll, J. D., & P. Arabie. (1980). Multidimensional scaling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 607-649.

Bonacich, P. (1979). The common structure semigroup: A replacement for the Boorman and white joint reduction. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 159-166.

Hiltz, S., & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation: Human communication via computer. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Reitz, K. P. (1982). Using log linear analysis with network data: Another look at Sampsons monastery. Social Networks, 4, 243-256.

Skvoretz, J. (1991). Theoretical and methodological models of networks and relations. Social Networks, 13, 275-300.

Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.

Markus, L. (1987). Towards a critical mass theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence, and diffusion. Communication Research, 14, 491-511.

Barley, S. (1990). The alignment of technology and structure through roles and ritual. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 61-103.

Harary, F., & Ross, I.C. (1957). A procedure for clique detection using the group matrix. Sociometry, 20, 205-215.

Borgatti, S., & Everett, M. (1999). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21, 375-395.

Contractor, N., & Eisenberg, E. (1990). Communication networks and new media in organizations. In J. F. C. Steinfield (Ed.), Organizations and communication technology. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Cummings, J., & Cross, R. (2003). Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks, 25(3), 197-210.

Klemmer, E., & F. Snyder. (1972). Measurement of time spent communicating. Journal of Communication, 22, 142-158.

Fararo, T.J., & J. Skvoretz. (1984). Biased networks and social structure theorems, Part II.Social Networks, 6, 223-258.

Wellman, B. (1992). Which types of ties and networks provide which types of support? In E. Lawler, Markovsky, B., Ridgeway, C., & Walker, H. (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes. Greenwich, CT, JAI Press.

Holland, C., & Lockett, A. (1997). Mixed mode network structures: The strategic use of electronic communication by organizations. Organization Science, 8(5), 100-130.

Greembaum, S. D. (1982). Bridging ties at the neighborhood level. Social Networks, 4, 367-384.

Cook, K. (1982). Network structures from an exchange perspective. In P. Marsden and N. Lin (Eds.). Social structure and network analysis. Beverly Hills, Sage.

Killworth, P.D., & Bernard, H.R. (1976). Informant accuracy in social network data. Human Organization, 35, 269-286.

Holland, P. W., Laskey, K.B., & Leinhardt, S. (1983). Stochastic blockmodels: Some first steps. Social Networks 5, 109-137.

Light, J.M., & Mullins, N.C. (1979). A primer on blockmodeling procedure. In P. W. Holland & S. Leinhardt (Eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research, 85-118. New York, Academic Press.

Fiskel, Joseph. (1980). Dynamic evolution in societal networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 7, 27-46.

Papa, W., & Papa M. (1992). Communication network patterns and the re-invention of new technology. The Journal of Business Communication, 29(1), 41-61.

Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria, & Eccles, R. (Ed.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 216-239). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Tutzauer, F. (1985). Toward a theory of disintegration in communication networks. Social Networks, 7, 263-285.

Burt, R. S. (1979). Relational equilibrium in a social topology. Journal of Mathematical Sociological, 6, 211-252.

Markovsky, B., J. Skvoretz, D. Willer, M. Lovaglia & J. Erger. (1993). The seeds of weak power: An extension of network exchange theory. American Sociological Review, 58, 197-209.

Kadushin, C. (1966). The friends and supporters of psychotherapy: On social circles in urban life. American Sociological Review, 31, 786-802.

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology. 91, 481-510.

Burt, R. (2000). Decay functions. Social Networks, 22, 1-28.

Carley, K. P., M. (1992). Extracting, representing, and analyzing mental models. Social Forces, 70(3), 601-636.

Barnes, J. A. (1972). Social networks. Addison-Wesley Module in Anthropology, 26, 1-29.

Farace, R.V., & T. Mabee. (1980). Communication network analysis methods. In P.R. Monge and J.N. Cappella (Eds.),Multivariate Techniques for Human Communication Research (365-392). New York: Academic Press.

Bainbridge, W.S., E.E. Brent, K.M. Carley, D.R. Heise, M.W. Macy, B. Markovsky, & J. Skvoretz. (1994). Artificial social intelligence. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 407-436.

Harary, F., Norman, R.Z., & Cartwright, D. (1965). Structural models: An introduction to the theory of directed graphs. New York, J. Wiley and Sons.

Iacobucci, D. (1989). Modeling multivariate sequential dyadic interactions. Social Networks, 11, 315-362.

Carrington, P. J., G. H. Heil, & S. Berkowitz. (1979). A goodness-of-fit index for blockmodels. Social Networks, 2, 219-234.

Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119-135.

Athanassiou, N., & Nigh, D. (1999). The impact of U.S. company internationalization on top management team advice networks: A tacit knowledge perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 83-92.

Uehara, E. (1990). Dual exchange theory: Social networks and informal social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 521-57.

Higgins, M., & Kram, K. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 264-288.

Borgatti, S.P., & Everett, M. (1989). The class of regular equivalences, Algebraic structure and computation. Social Networks, 11, 65-88.

Cummings, J. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352-364.

Harary, F. & H. J. Kommel. (1979). Matrix measures for transitivity and balance. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 6, 199-210.

Ornstein, M.D. (1982). Interlocking directorates in Canada. Social Networks, 4, 3-25.

Forsyth, E., & Katz, L. (1946). A matrix approach to the analysis of sociometric data, Preliminary report. Sociometry, 9, 340-347.

Berkowitz, S.D., P. J. Carrington, Y. Kotowitz, & L. Waverman. (1978). The determination of enterprise groupings through combined ownership and directorship ties. Social Networks, 1, 391-413.

Davis, J. (1963). Structural balance, mechanical solidarity, and interpersonal relations, American Journal of Sociology, 68, 444-62

Davis, J. A. (1977). Sociometric triads as multi-variate systems. Journal of Mathematical Sociological, 5, 41-60.

Burt, R. S. (1983). Corporate profits and cooptation: Networks of market constraints and directorate ties in the American economy. New York: Academic Press.

Fernandez, R. M., & R. V. Gould. (1994). A dilemma of state power: Brokerage and influence in the national health policy domain. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1455-91.

Hoyt, D., & Babchuk, N. (1983). Adult kinship networks: The selective formation of intimate ties with kin. Social Forces, 62(1), 84-101.

Davis, J. A. (1970). Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: Testing two theoretical models on 742 sociograms. American Sociological Review, 35, 843-852.

Everett, M.G. (1982). Graph theoretic blockings K-Plexes and K-cutpoints. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 9, 75-84

OReilly, C.A., & Roberts, K. (1974). Information filtration in organizations: Three experiments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 253-265.

Freeman, L. C. (1992). The sociological concept of group: An empirical test of two models. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 152-166.

Fulk, J., & Steinfield, C. (1990). Organizations and communication technology. Newbury Park, CA, Sage.

Morgan, D., Neal, M., & Carder, P. (1996). The stability of core and peripheral networks over time. Social Networks, 19, 9-25.

Hansen, M. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3), 232-248.

Hinrichs, J.R. (1964). Communications activity of industrial research personnel. Journal of Personal Psychology, 17, 193-204.

Hoivik, T. & N. Gleditsch. (1975). Structural parameters of graphs: A theoretical investigation. In Blalock et al. (Eds.). Quantitative sociology. New York, Academic Press.

Freeman, L. C., Romney, A.K., & Freeman, S.C. (1987). Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 89, 310-325.

Buchanan, M. (2002). Nexus: Small worlds and the groundbreaking science of networks. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Oliver, M. (1988). The urban black community as network: Toward a social network perspective. Sociological Quarterly, 29, 623-645.

Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications.

White, H.C., Boorman, S.A., & Breiger, R.L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks I: Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 730-779.

Eisenberg, E., Monge, P, & Miller, K. (1983). Involvement in communication networks as a predictor of organizational commitment. Human Communication Research, 10(2), 179-201.

Mayer, T. F. (1984). Parties and networks: Stochastic models for relationship networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 10, 51-103.

Phillips, D.P., & R.H. Conviser. (1972). Measuring the structure and boundary properties of graphs: Some uses of information theory. Sociometry, 35, 235-254.

Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A mily of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1170-1182.

Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1997). Studying online social networks. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(1).

Burns, J., & Stalker, G. (1961). The management of innovation. London, Tavistock.

Jablin, F., L. Putnam, & K. Roberts. (1987). Handbook of organizational communication. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

Carroll, J. D., P. Green, and C. Schaffer. (1986). Interpoint distance comparisons in correspondence analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 271-180.

Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Burt, R., Hogarth, R., & Michaud, C. (2000). The social capital of French and American managers. Organization Science, 11(2), 123-147.

Guetzkow, H. (1965). Communication in organizations. In J. March (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations (pp. 534-573). Chicago, IL, Rand McNally & Company.

White, H. (1992). Identity and control: A structural theory of social action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bernard, H.R., Killworth, P.D., McCarty, C., Shelley, G.A., & Robinson, S. (1990). Comparing four different methods for measuring personal social networks. Social Networks 12, 179-216.

Jeurissen, R.H. (1981). The incidence matrix and labelings of a graph. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 30, 290-301.

Alba, R. D. (1973). A graph-theoretic definition of a sociometric clique Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 3, 113-126 .

Levine, J.H. (1972). The sphere of influence. American Sociological Review 37, 14-27.

Hallinan, M. (1972). Comment on Holland and Leinhardt. American Journal of Sociology, 77, 1201- 1205.

Boorman, S.A., & White, H.C. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks II: Role structures. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 1384-1446.

Newcomb, T.M. (1953). An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psychological Review. 60, 393-404.

Clawson, D. & A. Neustadtl. (1989). Interlocks, PACs, and corporate conservatism. American Journal of Sociology. 94, 749-73.

Back, K. (1951). Influence through social communication. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 46, 9-23.

Mizruchi, M. S., P. Mariolis, M. Schwartz, & B. Mintz. (1986). Techniques for disaggregating centrality scores in social networks, pp. 26-48 in N. Tuma (Ed.) Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Arabie, P., Boorman, S.A., & Levitt, P.R. (1978). Constructing blockmodels: How and why. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 17, 21-63.

Powell, G., & Butterfield, D. (1978). The case for subsystem climates in organization. Academy of Management Review, 3, 151-157.

Alkire, A., M. Collum, J. Kaswan, & L. Love. (1968). Information exchange and accuracy of verbal communication under social power conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(4), 301-308.

Crane, D. (1969). Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the invisible college hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 34, 335-352.

Rulke, D., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2000). Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. Management Science, 46(5), 612-625.

Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 105, 177-231.

Lovaglia, M., J. Skvoretz, D. Willer, & B. Markovsky. (1995). Negotiated exchanges in social networks. Social Forces, 75, 123-155.

Peay, E.R. (1974). Hierarchical clique structures. Sociometry, 37, 54-65.

Monge, P., & Contractor, N. (1997). Emergence of communication networks. In L. P. F. Jablin, and K. R.s (Ed.), Handbook of organizational communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rapoport, A. (1963). Mathematical models of Social interaction, In R. Luce, R. Bush and E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, Vol. II (pp. 493-579). New York: Wiley.

Snyder, D. & E. L. Kick. (1979). Structural position in the world system and economic growth 1955-1970: A multiple-network analysis of transnational interactions, American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1096-1126.

Dean, J., & Brass, D. (1985). Social interaction and the perception of job characteristics in an organization. Human Relations, 38, 571-582.

Leinhardt, S. (Ed.) (1977). Social networks: A developing paradigm. New York, Academic Press.

Cartwright, D. (1979). Balance and clusterability: An overview. In P. Holland and S. Leinhardt (Eds.) Perspectives on social network research (pp. 25-50). New York: Academic Press.

Shepard, R.N. (1972). Multidimensional scaling. New York: Seminar Press.

Krackhardt, D., & Porter, L. (1985). When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 242-261.

Krackhardt, D. (1987). Cognitive social structures. Social Networks 9, 109-134.

Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40, 35-41.

Wilson, T.P. (1982). Relational networks: An extension of sociometric concepts. Social Networks, 4(2), 105-116.

Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J.H. (1982). Network analysis. Newbury Park, CA, Sage.

Davis, J. A. (1967). Clustering and structural balance in graphs. Human Relations 20, 181-187.

Burt, R. S. (1987). A note on strangers, friends, and happiness. Social Networks, 9, 311-332.

Albrecht, T., & Adelman, M. (1987). Communication networks as structures of social support. In T. Albrecht & M. Adelman (Ed.), Communicating social support. Newbury Park, Sage.

Davis, J. A. (1968). Statistical analysis of pair relationships: Symmetry, subjective consistency, and reciprocity. Sociometry 31, 102-119.

Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.

Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.

Homans, G.C. (1950). The human group. New York, Harcourt Brace.

Fararo, T.J., & J. Skvoretz. (1984). Institutions as production systems. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 10, 117-182.

Feinberg, S. E., & Wasserman, S. (1981). Categorical data analysis of single sociometric relations. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.) Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Dow, G. (1988). Configurational and coactivational views of organizational structure. Academy of Management Review, 12:1, 53-64.

Breiger, R. L., & P. E. Pattison. (1978). The joint role structure of two communities elites. Sociological Methods and Research, 7, 213-26.

Alexander, M., & Danowski, J. (1990). Analysis of an ancient network. Social Networks, 12, 313-35.

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Peay, E. R. (1976). A note concerning the connectivity of social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4, 319-321

Baker, W. (1994). Networking smart: How to build relationships for personal and organizational success. New York, NY, McGraw Hill.

Seidman, S.B., & Foster, B.L. (1978). A graph-theoretic generalization of the clique concept. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 6, 139-154.

Festinger, L. (1949). The analysis of sociograms using matrix algebra. Human Relations, 2, 153-158.

Thurman (1979). In the office: Networks and coalitions. Social Networks, 2, 47-63.

Emirbayer, M. & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problems of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1411-54.

Breiger, R.L. (1976). Career attributes and network structure: A blockmodel study of a bio-medical research specialty. American Sociological Review, 41, 117-135

Doreian, P. (1974). On the connectivity of social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 3, 245-258.

Baker, W. E. (1986). Three-dimensional blockmodels. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 12, 191-223.

Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1976). The statistical analysis of local structure in social networks. In D.R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1-45. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2), 183-196.

Borgatti, S., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49, 432-445.

Doreian, P. (1982). Maximum likelihood methods for linear models: Spatial effect and spatial disturbance terms. Sociological Methods & Research, 10, 243-270.

Barney, J.B. (1985). Dimensions of informal social network structure: Toward a contingency theory of informal relations in organizations. Social Networks, 7, 1-46.

Bavelas, A. (1948). A mathematical model for group structure. Human Organization, 7, 16-30.

Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 1, 61-67.

Read, W. H. (1962). Upward communication in industrial hierarchies. Human Relations, 15, 3-16.

Dorien, P., & Mrvar, A. (1996). A partitioning approach to structural balance. Social Networks, 18(2), 149-168.

Faust, K., & Romney, A.K. (1985). Does structure find structure?: A critique of Burts use of distance as a measure of structural equivalence. Social Networks, 7, 77-103.

Others were saucier, and appropriately so.

Over the last few years, most media companies have taken on social media editors, lots of them young-ish, lots of them digital natives. (Some neither, of course!) Many of their jobs are construed as helping newsrooms do social media best: working with writers, working with official social media accounts, those kind of things. Some of them are more like lone Internet addicts. At the more straight news outfits, most of them play it pretty straight. Some of them misplace their resources: for instance, there was a big vogue for media organizations moving onto Tumblr. And then everyone found out that, while it was nice to have a stand-alone Tumblr publication, that it literally didnt do a single thing for a news organization. Didnt bring traffic, didnt bring non-Tumblr attention: they operate in a black hole, essentially. If you like reblogs of your gifs, great! But this was a thing news orgs had been sold on. At lots of media organizations, decision-makers dont know where to start with social media. And lots dont know where their social media editors should stop and start in their work.

Craig Kanalley (ckanal) April 19, 2013

And then there was Matthew Keys, Deputy Social Media Editor at Reuters, once considered a wunderkind of new media. His livestream today of any word, rumor, idea, anything: just absurd!

If you know either of the Boston suspects and want to talk please DM me.manhunt

Thats a minutes worth of Tweets. The sheer amount of useless, misleading and random noise put out by this account is unreal.

Over the last 24 hours, weve seen a lot of different approaches. For instance, Liz Heron and Rubina Fillion were busy keeping the WSJ Twitter irly dry and rumor-free. There was a 15-hour silence from Daniel Victor at the Times. Eric Carvin likewise is busy at the AP, working.

OK everybody, Social Media, big time out. Have to shower. Well pick this back up in 10 minutes. Thanks for your participation and understanding.

Katie Rogers (katierogers) April 19, 2013

Hey everybody, listen up: I gotta go take a time out,new york asian escorts and then Ill come back here and post some more comments. Have to use the bathroom. Ate a lot of Mexican food last night. Nuff said. Thanks for undIs Your Social Media Editor Destroying Your News Organization Todayerstanding.

The important thing, I think, is toas soon as you know something that you sent out is incorrect, you correct the record. And its OK, I think, to make mistakes in these circumstances. Youeveryone will make mistakes, and its kind of almost impossible to avoid them.

FALSE REPORT : Just in: Suspect 2 on the ground at gunpoint.

Brian Ries (moneyries) April 19, 2013

Appreciate the update, can you please also include a number in curly brackets to indicate how credible you believe that information to be

Even so, he was doing a better job than most of the people on TV. Except, you know, they were distributing half-baked semi-information to millions, instead of dozens.

And all around them, other real news organizations were retweeting or sharing inaccurate information.

Cease your angsty thinkpieces. The FBI believes in the power of the crowd. How they nabbed Whitey Bulger: sfgate.com/business/bloom

There was a good bit of self-referential whatnots. That makes sense, kind of: social media is sometimes where you put the kind of things youd say out loud in a newsroom.

perhaps if I was in a real newsroom with access to my work email, instead of shut out a month ago, I wouldnt be working out of a bedroom

RT wgrz: Police source:2 Russian nationals pulled over in Niagara Falls; 4 suspicious backpacks in the car, robot &hey were way more informSocial Mediaed but also a LOT more cautious. Sounds obvious but it really made me think a lot about how I consume news in general.

And then theres the more aggressive sort of social media editor, like the inmous Ant DeRosa at Reutersor the Daily Beasts Brian Ries, who just pummeled Twitter relentlessly.

Mike Hayes (michaelhayes) April 19, 2013

I usually keep an eye on clarajeffery in a crisisgood eye, level head, good sense of humor, always up late. Social media editors should take a page from her book and try to help people find legit primary sources and offer perspective when they can. Take a breath and use your critical culties. Jesus.

Matthew Keys (TheMatthewKeys) April 19, 2013

Slates social media editor, Jeremy Stahl.

Megyn Kelly (megynkelly) April 19, 2013

Btw for those just joining us in AM, this is what last 12 hours have been like ask moneyries buzzfeedandrew antderosa

Why? He has 4430 followers. What does anyone gain? It looks like work, maybe, but its not. (Is it? Maybe it is!)

new york asian escorts

Media Task Force would like to request a slot on April 23 PM because some members will be unavailable on April 24

Note: Media Task Force would like to rHTMLwg2013-04-Agenda Webequest a slot on April 23 PM because some members will be unavailable on April 24

Moving Image Description Extension to Last Call and plans for re-integration with HTML 5.1 (A11Y TF)

for this meeting by 5-Apr-2012.

NOTE: Paypal is hosting a reception at 4-6pm on Wed AprWeb 24 at the meeting location.

Note: Media Task Force would like to request a slot on April 23 PM because some members will be unavailable on April 24

() The Web Applications Working Group ends at noon on Friday 26.

This page is for the HTML WG f2f: 23-24 April (Tuesday-Wednesday).

Contact:

Email Information

April 22 (Reuters) - Pep Guardiola is not the only connection between Bayern Munich and Barcelona, who meet in their Champions League semi-final, first leg at the Allianz Arena on Tuesday. Both teams are dominating their leagues to an almost embarrassing extent, have won the Champions League four times apiece, share an acrimonious rivalry with Real Madrid, and owe part of their success to the flamboyant Dutchman Louis van Gaal. Both have also been in two Champions League finals in the last four years, though the Catalans won both of theirs and the Bavarians came out losers on each occasion. ...

Why Social Media Marketing Matters for Small Business

Web.

Part I

April 21 (Infostrada Sports) - Standings from the World Ranking 1. Fabian Cancellara (Switzerland / RadioShack) 351 2. Peter Sagan (Slovakia / Cannondale) 312 3. Daniel Martin (Ireland / Garmin) 247 4. Joaquim Rodriguez (Spain / Katusha) 246 5. Richie Porte (Australia / Team Sky) 200 6. Nairo Quintana (Colombia / Movistar) 182 7. Sergio Henao (Colombia / Team Sky) 164 8. Alejandro Valverde (Spain / Movistar) 150 9. Carlos Betancur (Colombia / AG2R) 145 10. Sylvain Chavanel (France / Omega Pharma - Quick-Step) 142 11. Greg Van Avermaet (Belgium / BMC Racing) 140 12. ...

JM Internet Group

Social Media Marketing - What is Social Media? How does Web 1.0 differ from Web 2.0, and where are the marketing opportunities? Your Social Media Marketing (SMM) Plan

Apr 22 (Reuters) - ATP World Tour rankings on Monday (lastweeks positions in brackets): 1. (1) Novak Djokovic (Serbia) points 2. (3) Roger Federer (Switzerland) 8670 3. (2) Andy Murray (Scotland) 8660 4. (4) David Ferrer (Spain) 6970 5. (5) Ra Nadal (Spain) 5985 6. (6) Tomas Berdych (Czech Republic) 4760 7. (7) Juan Martin Del Potro (Argentina) 4750 8. (8) Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (France) 3875 9. (9) Richard Gasquet (France) 3365 10. (10) Janko Tipsarevic (Serbia) 3000 11. (11) Marin Cilic (Croatia) 2675 12. (12) Nicolas Almagro (Spain) 2450 13. (15) Milos Raonic (Canada) 2225 14. ...

Tel. +1-

Twitter Marketing: What Twitter is, how to Tweet effectively!

The (web: jm-搜索引擎优化.org), a leader in providing social media training online, is proud to announce their April classes on using social media like , Twitter, and Facebook for marketing purposes will begin on Friday, April 19, 2013. The social media class has traditionally been taught over two online training sessions; however, the new Social Media Market training has been expanded with even more information and instruction into over three online sessions. The newly offered trainings go over the fundamentals of , Facebook, LinkedIn, and Google+; as well as + Local (formerly Google Places), Yelp, Amazon reviews, Youtube, Twitter, and so much more. Social media marketing, they say, is all about the conversation, explained Jason McDonald, director of the JM Internet Group. Our April classes are proving to be very popular, but space is still available. Interested parties can also take the no cost introduction to the top Social Media Marketing tools.

Email. jm.internetgroup(at)gmail(dot)com

Los Angeles, CA (PRWEB) April 17, 2013

By Martyn Herman LONDON, April 21 (Reuters) - Manchester City manager Roberto Mancini says his side are not inferior to Manchester United despite a 3-1 defeat at Tottenham Hotspur on Sunday giving their rivals the chance to clinch their 20th league title with four games to spare. Victory for United at home to Aston Villa on Monday would put Alex Fergusons side 16 points clear of City - a huge margin compared to last seasons title race that went down to the last kick of the season. ...

Social Media Marketing Plan: creating an organized plan defining social media goals, the opportunities posed by the most relevant media, a step-by-step to do list, and finally a participation and monitoring strategy.

As part of the JM Internet Groups trainings in online Social Media Marketing, the website hosts a no cost on demand webinar on the top ten free tools for SEO. In addition, all students who sign up for the paid social media marketing trainings get a copy of the companys Social Media Toolbook - tips and pointers to over 100 no cost social media tools online.

Social media training class teaches small business marketers the secrets of Twitter, Facebook, etc.New

training class teaches small business marketers the secrets of Twitter,new york asian escorts , etc. The live online classes in begin April 19, 2013, and cost just $300 per person.

Social media marketing is the next big thing for small business, but its not just about lead generation - its about relationship building. SMM is the knowledge and skill to gain Twitter followers, and then use Twitter marketing to get them to buy. Social MediaSMM is the knowledge to set up a Facebook n, get Facebook ns, and then build relationships and start conversations about a brand and products on Facebook. And SMM is all about leveraging free social media tools to monitor online reputation and build buzz.

Social Media Marketing - Class Syllabus

April 21 (Infostrada Sports) - Results and standings from the English premier league matches on Sunday Sunday, April 21 Liverpool 2 Chelsea 2 Tottenham Hotspur 3 Manchester City 1 Saturday, April 20 Fulham 0 Arsenal 1 Norwich City 2 Reading 1 Queens Park Rangers 0 Stoke City 2 Sunderland 1 Everton 0 Swansea City 0 Southampton 0 West Bromwich Albion 1 Newcastle United 1 West Ham United 2 Wigan Athletic 0 Standings P W D L F A Pts 1 Manchester United 33 26 3 4 75 35 81 2 Manchester City 33 20 8 5 59 30 68 3 Arsenal 34 18 9 7 65 35 63 -------------------------4 Chelsea 33 18 8 7 66 35 62 ...

By Gregory Blachier MONTE CARLO, April 21 (Reuters) - Rael Nadal admitted he is still trying to recapture his best form but remained optimistic for the French Open after losing his Monte Carlo crown to Novak Djokovic on Sunday. Nadal, who returned to action in March after seven months out with injury, went down 6-2 7-6 to the Serbian world number one, ending his eight-year reign on the principalitys clay. I need to put in a little bit more physical performance, the Spaniard told a news conference. Thats the real thing - to play all the points with the same intensity. ...

0

LONDSocial Media Training Classes for Small Business Starts April 19 2013 Announces JM Internet Group - Yahoo! NewsON, April 22 (Reuters) - Liverpools Luis Suarez was charged with violent conduct by the Football Association on Monday after biting Chelseas Branislav Ivanovic in a Premier League match on Sunday. The Liverpool striker apologised swiftly after the 2-2 draw, during which he scored an injury-time equaliser, and was fined by his club on Monday amid widespread media condemnation. Suarez could be in line for a lengthy suspension after the FA said a three-match ban would be insufficient. ...

Media Relations

Local Search and Reviews Marketing: Google Places, Yelp, and Amazon.com Reviews - getting listed, engaging customers via reviews, being high on the search list.

For more information on the April Social Media Marketing training, go to:

The JM Internet Group provides SEO, Social Media Marketing, and Google AdWords training and courses for busy marketers and businesspeople. Online search engine optimization training helps explain keywords, page tags, link building strategies and other techniques needed to climb to the top of search engine rankings for Google, Yahoo, and Bing. The teaching methodology is hands on, with live examples and discussions, taught from the convenience of each students computer.

JM Internet Group, Media Relations

About JM Internet Group

Part II

By Brian Homewood MUNICH, April 22 (Reuters) - Bayern Munich coach Jupp Heynckes will leave the club at the end of the season with his head held high whether they win the treble or not, he said on Monday. When a team like Bayern is playing at such a high standard the trainer can only leave by the front door regardless of whether we win the German Cup and the Champions League, he told a news conference ahead of Tuesdays semi-final first leg against Barcelona. Listen to what the German media say about my team. They say we are playing the most modern football in the history of Bayern. ...

Part III

YouTube Marketing: leveraging Youtubes special relationship with Google as part of a SEO strategy as well as your social media strategy.

Social Media - Facebook, Linkedin, Google+ Marketing. How to listen, engage, Social Media and deploy an effective social media strategy.